Texas Kaos
TAKE TEXAS BACK!TM

RSS Feed
TexasKaos.com FeedBurner


Regional Coverage
Hot Topics
Blogads
Keep your Internet costs Low!  Protect Net Neutrality!

TAKE TEXAS BACK!
A bunch of thieves, thugs, and nutcases took over Texas. Then they used it as a stepping stone to Washington, DC.

They raided our treasury, stripped our schools and handed it all to their corporate cronies.

Y'all ready to do something about it?

We're taking Texas Back. Join us!


Search




Advanced Search


News in Texas

Spill Baby Spill: Update

by: Libby Shaw

Mon May 03, 2010 at 20:18:10 PM CDT


Thanks to an era of the federal government's deregulation of almost all regulated industries, the U.S. failed to implement a safety feature for off shore oil drilling that is required in most countries that participate in this practice.

From St. Ronald the Great through the Bush II Administration, the Republican majority has been and continues to be on a 30 year crusade to allow the oil boys to do whatever it takes for them to turn a quick buck.

Republican lawmakers hope and believe that the oil boys will continue to donate generously to the campaign coffers of all enabling politicians that willingly turn a blind eye to the raping and pillaging of our environment.

Today we are living the nightmare of a fully operational and legal Republican energy agenda with a catastrophic and devastating oil spill in the Gulf off of the Louisiana shore.

Libby Shaw :: Spill Baby Spill: Update
What or who caused this environmental tragedy?

Norway and other countries require the implementation of a safety device that costs a mere $500,000 for all offshore drilling rigs.  Norway and other countries anticipate and plan for calamities so that they don't live the ecological nightmare and economic horror show that BP Petroleum has created for us.

Below is a glimpse into the W.'s Administration's efforts to work on behalf of big energy while throwing the American people to the dogs.

The White House is working to enact a wide array of federal regulations, many of which would weaken government rules aimed at protecting consumers and the environment, before President Bush leaves office in January.

The new rules would be among the most controversial deregulatory steps of the Bush era and could be difficult for his successor to undo. Some would ease or lift constraints on private industry, including power plants, mines and farms.

Those and other regulations would help clear obstacles to some commercial ocean-fishing activities, ease controls on emissions of pollutants that contribute to global warming, relax drinking-water standards and lift a key restriction on mountaintop coal mining.

Once such rules take effect, they typically can be undone only through a laborious new regulatory proceeding, including lengthy periods of public comment, drafting and mandated reanalysis.

"They want these rules to continue to have an impact long after they leave office," said Matthew Madia, a regulatory expert at OMB Watch, a nonprofit group critical of what it calls the Bush administration's penchant for deregulating in areas where industry wants more freedom. He called the coming deluge "a last-minute assault on the public . . . happening on multiple fronts."

Meanwhile, W. continues to clear brush, or do whatever he does in Dallas while raking in boatloads of cash.  

The outcome for residents in the Gulf region, thanks to the Republican energy agenda, is not so rosy.  Frank the fisherman lost his source of income along with Helen the hotel owner, Rachel the restaurant owner and Sally and Burt who run the local supermarket and bait shop.

A big debt of gratitude should also be extended to Dick Cheney and all of those high flying oil boys he invited to write our nation's energy policies. Perhaps all of those who wrote the policy, including Mr. Cheney, should be required to help pay for cleaning up BP's environmental carnage.  Perhaps they should also be made to form charitable foundations in order to financially support fishermen and others whose livelihoods have been devastated for a long time to come. This should also apply to the tourist industries, towns and cities that will also be impacted by the ravages of this unforgivable oil spill.

Of course I am dreaming. Since when do Republicans give a crap about anyone except for their big moneyed fat cats who take care of their Republican lawmaking mistresses needs as long as madame the Republican lawmakers delivers.

Republican politicians, of course will back peddle, if they have not already done so, on their passionate commitment and proclamations to drill, baby, drill.

Sarah weighs in.

Michael wants to party with the drilling boys too.

FOX and Rush have a lot of 'splaining to do too for this oil spill carnage seriously interferes with both Rush and Fox's narratives on cap and trade, global warming and their serial dependence on bashing Al Gore.

As one would predict, a psycho babbling Rush, in one of his typically paranoid and pathologically deranged moments, blames the oil calamity on environmentalists who sabotaged the rig.

Rush could seriously use a new pusher man.

Fox Fixed News goes on a loony tunes truther crusade.

What Fox does.

Fox could obviously also use a seriously new pusher man.

I guess when truth and reality interfere with a Republican talking point, the right will jump through hoops to change the subject.  If that does not work, the right will find an evil doing scapegoat on whose back they will paint a target.

Governor Perry chose to blame the BP oil leak on God.

Their behavior is becoming so transparent and predictable that it would be hilarious if the consequences of right wing Republican ideology were not so horrific.  Two years ago former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson allowed the banks to empty our national treasury into their armored trucks, no questions asked.  Meanwhile Wall St. had crashed causing tens of thousands if not millions to lose their life long savings, jobs and homes.  A couple of weeks ago a terrible gas leak at a coal mine killed 29 workers.  And now we have the oil spill debacle in the Gulf which may be the worst in history.  

I am afraid to think about what new Republican made catastrophe will happen next.  And if and when does, I am sure St. Ronald, W. and Dick Cheney will have a had a hand in it too.

Update 5/5/10:  An article in the Washington Post today reveals that BP had been granted a categorical exclusion from the National Environmental Policy Act on April 6, 2009.

The decision by the department's Minerals Management Service (MMS) to give BP's lease at Deepwater Horizon a "categorical exclusion" from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on April 6, 2009 -- and BP's lobbying efforts just 11 days before the explosion to expand those exemptions -- show that neither federal regulators nor the company anticipated an accident of the scale of the one unfolding in the gulf.

Is this the outcome of incompetence or corruption at the federal level?

"They never did an analysis that took into account what turns out to be the very real possibility of a serious spill," said Holly Doremus, a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley who has reviewed the documents.

Lobbying money played a big role.

The agency's oversight role has devolved to little more than rubber-stamping British Petroleum's self-serving drilling plans," Suckling said.

BP has lobbied the White House Council on Environmental Quality -- which provides NEPA guidance for all federal agencies-- to provide categorical exemptions more often. In an April 9 letter, BP America's senior federal affairs director, Margaret D. Laney, wrote to the council that such exemptions should be used in situations where environmental damage is likely to be "minimal or non-existent." An expansion in these waivers would help "avoid unnecessary paperwork and time delays," she added.

It seems to me that we have a bunch of heckofajobs as regulators whose butts should have been fired yesterday.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Re: Spill Baby Spill (0.00 / 0)

Thanks to an era of the federal government's deregulation of almost all regulated industries, the U.S. failed to implement a safety feature for off shore oil drilling that is required in most countries that participate in this practice...Their behavior is becoming so transparent and predictable that it would be hilarious if the consequences of right wing Republican ideology were not so horrific.

Are you sure you aren't jumping to conclusions prematurely, Libby Shaw?  Mr. Papantonio may or may not be correct about the acoustic trigger.

"There are, of course, other questions to be asked. We do not know what caused the blowout or the fire, or why the valves that are supposed to shut off the oil flow in an emergency did not work."
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05...

What we know for sure, though, is that, as usual, your diary isn't telling the whole truth.

"Yet the administration should not have waited, and should have intervened much more quickly on its own initiative.

"A White House as politically attuned as this one should have been conscious of two obvious historical lessons. One was the Exxon Valdez, where a late and lame response by both industry and the federal government all but destroyed one of the country's richest fishing grounds and ended up costing billions of dollars. The other was President George W. Bush's hapless response to Hurricane Katrina.

"Now we have another disaster in more or less the same neck of the woods, and it takes the administration more than a week to really get moving.

"The timetable is damning...

"In addition to a series of media events designed to convey urgency - including a Rose Garden appearance by the president - the administration ordered the Air Force to help with chemical spraying of the oil slick and the Navy to help lay down oil-resistant booms."
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05...

"If U.S. officials had followed up on a 1994 response plan for a major Gulf oil spill, it is possible that the spill could have been kept under control and far from land.

"The problem: The federal government did not have a single fire boom on hand."
http://blog.al.com/live/2010/0...

"What we do know is that we now face a huge disaster whose consequences might have been minimized with swifter action."
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05...

For a President so incredibly critical of the Bush Administration's Katrina response, there certainly seems to be plenty of blame to go around. Maybe Libby Shaw and Texas Kaos should be a little more honest in your analysis.  Then again, maybe that's too much to expect from you.


If anyone should be more honest (0.00 / 0)
you are it.  For one who listens to and believes a trash and hate talker like Glenn Beck would know nothing about reality or truthfulness.

It comes as no surprise to me that you would step up on behalf of big oil.  You must have read Greg Abbott's and Rick Perry's talking points this morning.  Texas Republicans are tripping all over themselves trying to rationalize BP shoddy crappy work.

Houston, Texas.  May 3, 2010. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott announced today at a press conference that BP has made "all the right actions and all the right comments" but that the Attorney General's office would be watching to "ensure that BP's action lives up to its current words." Governor Rick Perry was quoted as saying of the oil spill: "From time to time there are going to be things that occur that are acts of God that cannot be prevented."

Why am I not shocked that Rick Perry thinks BP's recklessness and incompetence is God's fault?  I wonder what Rick and Greg would think if that spill were creeping toward the Texas coast and our fishermen and the resort towns of South Padre Island were toast and covered with slime?

Rick Perry is a disgrace to the people of Texas.
 


[ Parent ]
Re: If anyone... (0.00 / 0)

It comes as no surprise to me that you would step up on behalf of big oil.

Please show me the exact words you consider to be stepping up on behalf of big oil.  BP is likely at fault for the spill; there is no getting around that.  But are you unwilling to admit that a swifter response from the government might have minimized the impact to the coast?  Apparently so.  That's the lack of honesty I'm talking about.


[ Parent ]
wow, I see it now, a repeated mistake (0.00 / 0)
You've shown me something today, Double-naught T-Bag.  This list is shockingly inadequate.
http://texaskaos.com/viewRatin...
Inevitably, whenever I misunderestimated Bush, it was in not imagining how far down into the depths of depravity and evil he could go.  You've forced me start another, longer, list to chronicle your particular flavor of inane BS.

LS - the sky is blue.
T007 - today's talking points from Wingnut Central indicate we should be discussing how Obama is a Marxist*

LS - it wasn't always so. Today we breath clean air because of EPA regulations.
T007 - Clinton did nothing.  The only good to come from his term in office was created by the GOP majority (when they shut down the government).  The 2000 budget surplus was a result of St Reagan's hatred of homos.

LS - offshore drilling poses legitimate environmental hazards
T007 - you and your pie-in-the-blue-sky America haters just want to socialize everything.

LS - speaking of socialists, the democratic socialist country of Norway has a safer method of off-shore drilling.
T007 - today's talking points from Wingnut Central indicate we should be discussing how Obama is a Marxist*, why do you keep changing the subject?

LS - instead of learning from a better example, it seems we choose to allow companies to do whatever they want, then blame Gawd when things inevitably turn to shit.
T007 - when will you be willing to admit you hate America?  Stay on topic!

LS - the cost of the safety equipment is insignificant to their net profit, while the cost to the planet is, as yet, uncalculable.
T007 - there you go again, with a lack of facts (you haven't yet calculated the incalculable).  we need more studies by the Cato Institute in reducing government oversight, and I have it on good authority from the Heritage Foundation it's really all Carter's fault.  He wanted solar panels ferchrissake!

*  When the "right" criticizes Obama, the point is to always force a shift in the Overton window favorably towards their "ideology" (if you want to call it that).  Obama has yet to criticized by the "right" for any of his policies that mimic, continue, or extend the unlawful and un-American actions seeded during BushCo's reign.

There was a society of men among us, bred up from their youth in the art of proving by words multiplied for the purpose, that white is black, and black is white, according as they are paid ...  Jonathan Swift, "Gulliver's Travels," 1726


[ Parent ]
You posted an opinion (0.00 / 0)
and treated it as a fact.  There is a huge difference between the two but as I've witnessed in the comments section of the Houston Chronicle, most right wingers don't  know the difference.

Yet the administration should not have waited, and should have intervened much more quickly on its own initiative.

"A White House as politically attuned as this one should have been conscious of two obvious historical lessons. One was the Exxon Valdez, where a late and lame response by both industry and the federal government all but destroyed one of the country's richest fishing grounds and ended up costing billions of dollars. The other was President George W. Bush's hapless response to Hurricane Katrina.

"Now we have another disaster in more or less the same neck of the woods, and it takes the administration more than a week to really get moving.

"The timetable is damning...

In my opinion, the editorial above is full of horse feathers.  The industry caused the leak and it is the industry's job to respond, fix and clean up.  If it is too stupid or incompetent to deal with a mess they made, then by all means bring in the feds.  But surely in this wonderful free market economy isn't there some private clean up firm out there that specializes in oil drilling failures and screw ups?  But I guess they would be far too pricey so BP hopes for a bailout from the feds?

Katrina was a natural disaster in which governments on the local, state and federal levels all failed miserably.  Remember Heckofajob Brownie?

I thought you folks hated the big evil government more than anything on the planet and yet you scream like squealing pigs when the big evil government does not immediately clean up a mess it did not make.

You folks don't make any sense at all.  


[ Parent ]
Re: You posted an opinion... (0.00 / 0)

You posted an opinion and treated it as a fact.

I posted the following FACTS:

1.  A plan was prepared in 1994 designed for government implentation immediately following a spill of this sort that would serve to protect the United States coastline.

2.  The Obama Administration failed to implement this plan in the timeframe for which it was designed.

Are you unwilling to admit that these are actually FACTS?  Apparently so.  This is the dishonesty I've been talking about.


[ Parent ]
The author of the blog post (0.00 / 0)
in Alabama failed to provide a link or source to the 1994 act that he cited.  

Here it is.

http://www.epa.gov/oem/docs/oi...

As you can see, the document originates from the EPA.  

Please describe in detail how the act cited above relates to BP's oil leak and what role the federal government should play in addressing the ecological and economic devastation to the region impacted.  

 


[ Parent ]
Re: The author... (0.00 / 0)

Please describe in detail how the act cited above relates to BP's oil leak and what role the federal government should play in addressing the ecological and economic devastation to the region impacted.  

The blog: "The "In-Situ Burn" plan produced by federal agencies in 1994 calls for responding to a major oil spill in the Gulf with the immediate use of fire booms."
http://blog.al.com/live/2010/0...

The ISB plan the blog mentions: Jason, N. H. In Situ Burning Oil Spill Workshop Proceedings, NIST SP 867, U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1994.

How the plan relates to the current spill: "The Minerals Management Service (MMS) is designated as the lead agency for In Situ Burn (ISB)research in the Oil Pollution Research and Technology Plan, prepared under the authority of Title VII of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. In January 1994, MMS sponsored a workshop, conducted by the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), to determine the research needs required to advance the use of ISB in spill response. This workshop was one of MMS's effort's to ensure the relevance of their research program to the needs of the user community. Specific emphasis was given to environmental and operational implications of ISB response technology...Results from laboratory tests, mesoscale burn experiments in Mobile, AL (1991-1994), the Alaska Emulsion Burn Experiments, and the full-scale
Newfoundland Offshore Burn Experiment (NOBE), continue to show that ISB is a rapid, effective, and environmentally safe means for removing large quantities of oil from the water's surface. Information from laboratory, mesoscale, and full-scale crude oil burns has contributed significantly to the understanding of the actual impact of oil spill burning. Burning, once regarded as a method
of last resort, is now, one of the first response methods to be considered by authorities in case of spill
...In the past five years, significant advances in the in situ burning of oil spills have been made. ISB as a response tool for large marine oil spills has progressed from a demonstration burn during the Exxon Valdez spill in 1989 to an accepted response technique. The relatively short window of opportunity for implementing ISB requires that burn operations be pre-planned and pre-approved to ensure an adequate response to spill events."
http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/...

The problem: the federal government did not follow the plan produced by federal agencies in 1994, which called for ISB to be one of the first responses methods used due to its relatively short window of opportunity.  Instead, the feds waited eight days before conducting a test burn.

Are you still unwilling to admit the Obama Administration failed to implement the ISB plan in the timeframe for which it was designed?  


[ Parent ]
Read the update to the diary (0.00 / 0)
The failure happened at the regulatory level.  

[ Parent ]
Re: Read the update... (0.00 / 0)

Read it.  My comments are as follows:

An article in the Washington Post today reveals that BP had been granted a categorical exclusion from the National Environmental Policy Act on April 6, 2009.

Who was the President on April 6, 2009?  Will you admit that this conflicts with your earlier statement that "the Republican majority has been and continues to be on a 30 year crusade to allow the oil boys to do whatever it takes for them to turn a quick buck"?

After all, "BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million to federal candidates over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics."
http://www.politico.com/news/s...

Perhaps you are pointing your finger at the wrong party on this one, Libby Shaw. Are you capable of admitting so?

 


[ Parent ]
Try as you may (0.00 / 0)
 the right will never be able to make the case that the GOP enabled BP fiasco is Obama's Katrina.  Why?  Because the majority of the people know the difference between truth and fiction.

You did not read the entire Washington Post article cited above.  It is a two page article describing in detail how the Bush Administration de-regulated just about every regulated industry between 2000-2008.  

The Interior Dept.s willingness to give BP an exemption from an environmental impact study is unforgivable, too.  The Dept. has been turning a blind eye to BP and oil companies for years.

Deregulation and the blind eyes have been at the expense of the American people, thank you.

By the way, how come Sarah and all of the other drill baby drill folks are so quiet?  I guess they will say they never said drill, baby, drill.



[ Parent ]
Re: Try as you may... (0.00 / 0)

Try as you may the right will never be able to make the case that the GOP enabled BP fiasco is Obama's Katrina.

I'm not making the case that the BP fiasco is Obama's Katrina.  I'm making the case that you are an intellectually dishonest individual.



[ Parent ]
a nice summary of the situation (0.00 / 0)
http://www.salon.com/technolog...

You call the OP a liar.  You call the disaster Obama's responsibility for acting too slowly.

If Obama had acted "swiftly", there would have been calls from the "Right" to "deliberate", to "listen to 'all sides'", to "start from the beginning", to "stop cramming this cleanup down our throats".

The beat may change, but the tune remain the same.  No matter what happens, find something to criticize and scream bloody murder.  This happened before during Clinton's administration.  The "Right", the petulant selfish self-righteous "Right", screamed invectives and lied to get their way.  If that didn't work, there was always shutting down the government or conducting a costly partisan never-ending witch hunt.  And when even that failed, they had one final plan - take credit for the other guy's work.

Here's a clue for you, free of charge.  You want to criticize Obama, fine.  Just make sure it's grounded in reality.  I know that's a strange place for you, with all kinds of uncomfortable things (like facts), but it is where things actually happen.

If you want to criticize Obama, and be taken seriously, then regurgitating the irrational fantasies of the GOP's patron demagogues won't get you very far.  Neither will posting tripe like this:

I'm not making the case that the BP fiasco is Obama's Katrina.  I'm making the case that you are an intellectually dishonest individual.



There was a society of men among us, bred up from their youth in the art of proving by words multiplied for the purpose, that white is black, and black is white, according as they are paid ...  Jonathan Swift, "Gulliver's Travels," 1726

[ Parent ]
Re: a nice summary... (0.00 / 0)

You call the disaster Obama's responsibility for acting too slowly.

No, I didn't.  Go back and read what I said.  I'm simply making the case that the OP's "Republicans are evil" rhetoric doesn't tell the whole truth.

Libby Shaw says the damage to the coastline is the sole fault of the Right.  FACT:  The Obama Administration did not follow protocal developed by federal agencies in 1994.

Libby Shaw says that the "fat cat" oil companies are in the back pocket of Republicans.  FACT: The recipient of te most British Petroleum campaign money over the past twenty years is one Barack Hussein Obama.

Libby Shaw predicts that Republicans will now claim they never called for increased offshore drilling.  FACT:  Democratic candidate Bill White just yesterday called for new drilling, saying: "Without new drilling for petroleum, the world's oil production would shrink quickly and dramatically during the next ten years. We would lose even more control over our energy supply and prices for all consumers everywhere would skyrocket...We cannot afford an energy policy that is based on either wishful thinking or irrational fear."
http://austinist.com/2010/05/0...

As I stated, what the OP posted is rhetoric that is not grounded in reality.      


[ Parent ]
agreed (0.00 / 0)
I'm simply making the case that the OP's "Republicans are evil" rhetoric doesn't tell the whole truth.

That's true.  They're also short-sighted, greedy, callow, hypocritical, traitorous, ignorant, hateful, and selfish.  

Did I miss anything? Oh yes.  Susceptible to the worst kinds of demagoguery.  Quick to prostrate themselves before a strong leader because it's just too hard to think for oneself.  

Petulant obsructionists.  

Sexually repressed perverts.

Fearful cowards.

I'm forgetting something....

As for Obama's receipt of large amounts of cash, perhaps you will join with me and others that would like to do away with our system of bribery?  That Obama received these bribes, payoffs, "donations" has more to do with his then perceived electability than anything specifically pernicious about the person or party.  The GOP's bread and butter is the large corporate donation.  To an ever so slightly lesser degree, so is the DNC's.  The only difference I can see is that the GOP gets them all the time, the DNC gets the equivalent when they're in power.

Naive ideologues.  
Meddlers in other people's business.  
Polluters.  
Apologists.  
Dominionists.  
Imperialists.

Of course! How could I forget?  Racists.

There was a society of men among us, bred up from their youth in the art of proving by words multiplied for the purpose, that white is black, and black is white, according as they are paid ...  Jonathan Swift, "Gulliver's Travels," 1726


[ Parent ]
Re: agreed (0.00 / 0)

As for Obama's receipt of large amounts of cash, perhaps you will join with me and others that would like to do away with our system of bribery?

There is nothing wrong with President Obama having received campaign contributions from BP.  There is something wrong with Libby Shaw pretending like it didn't happen.


[ Parent ]
corrections (0.00 / 0)
There's (probably) nothing illegal with Obama's having received campaign contributions from BP.  "Wrong" is another matter, especially from the perspective of a functioning democracy.

Regarding the OP's attitude.  Perhaps, maybe, just maybe, if the partisan opposition from the "Right" side of the debate, were uh, I dunno, sane, then maybe perhaps some partisan cheerleading, if that's what's upsetting you, wouldn't be necessary.

However, starting the day that awful so-and-so Clinton so blatantly stole the Oval Office from the the rightful heir to the throne, the GOP has been throwing histrionic hissy fits, deliberately moving the public debate farther and farther away from rational discussion.

There were things Clinton did, and things Obama is doing, that deserve partisan-free criticism (academic and otherwise).  Ideally, we would all look at the actions of the Executive from the perspective of what's good for the country, for democracy, for our perpetuating our ideals.  Even if that means having a public conversation on what they are.  Especially if that means having a public conversation on what they are.  

However, that all changed with the Starr investigation, a politically motivated partisan witch hunt intended to do only one thing, subvert a legal election.  It succeeded in polarizing the public discourse and forced a binary choice, thumbs up or down.  That process never ended, and continues to be used today, primarily by the "Right".  The only difference being your "side" lost, despite the demagoguery working through two terms of the most incompetent fool to hold the office in 100 years.

So suck on that while you're browsing the pages of the Heritage Foundation or the Family Research Council looking for inane non-sequitur BS to post. Reap what you sow, baby.

There was a society of men among us, bred up from their youth in the art of proving by words multiplied for the purpose, that white is black, and black is white, according as they are paid ...  Jonathan Swift, "Gulliver's Travels," 1726


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


TexasKaos Tools
Blogging 101

Add My Link!

RSS Feed
TexasKaos.com Feedburner
Add to Technorati Favorites (Why 2?)
Add to Google

Texas Elections

2006 Election Results
- Statewide Results
- US Senate Results
- US House Results
- TX Senate Results
- TX House Results

National Elections
US Congress
- US Senate Results
- US House Results
All States
- Governor Results
- Ballot Initiatives
TKaos Voter Tools
TX Democratic Party (TDP)
- TKaosopedia on TDP
- Current TDP Officers
- TDP Handbook
- Party Structure
- SDEC Mission
- SDEC Members
General
- Roberts Rules of Order
- Roberts Rules Online
- Democratic Party
- Who are my Reps?
- Contacting US Congress
- Contacting your state legislator (also legislative research and more!)
- Texas Almanac
- Direct Link to Texas Legislature, including online Video, when in session
Democratic Orgs
- Democratic Party
- Wise County Active Dems
- Harris County Dems
Texas Progressive Alliance
National Voices
- Atrios
- Blog for America
- Daily Kos
- The Field
- Firedog Lake
- Huffington Post
- Iraq Casualty List
- Jesus' General
- Kid Oakland
- Media Matters
- MyDD
- Open Left
- Pandagon
- Political Wire
- Shakespeare's Sister
- Talking Points Memo
Other Sites of Interest
- Army of Dude
- Latina Lista
- Pandagon
- Para Justicia y Libertad
More Tools
Technorati Profile

(Why 2?)

Texas Kaos logo design courtesy of Snarko!
Powered by: SoapBlox